Copyright
©
2004-2018 All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Blog Archive
- April 2017 ( 1 )
- September 2015 ( 1 )
- June 2015 ( 1 )
- May 2015 ( 2 )
- January 2015 ( 1 )
- December 2014 ( 1 )
- November 2014 ( 1 )
- September 2014 ( 1 )
- April 2014 ( 1 )
- March 2014 ( 2 )
- January 2014 ( 3 )
- December 2013 ( 1 )
- September 2013 ( 1 )
- April 2013 ( 1 )
- March 2013 ( 1 )
- February 2013 ( 1 )
- January 2013 ( 1 )
- December 2012 ( 1 )
- September 2012 ( 1 )
- July 2012 ( 2 )
- June 2012 ( 3 )
- May 2012 ( 3 )
- April 2012 ( 3 )
- March 2012 ( 1 )
- February 2012 ( 2 )
- November 2011 ( 1 )
- September 2011 ( 1 )
- August 2011 ( 2 )
- June 2011 ( 1 )
- April 2011 ( 1 )
- March 2011 ( 1 )
- February 2011 ( 1 )
- January 2011 ( 1 )
- November 2010 ( 1 )
- October 2010 ( 1 )
- September 2010 ( 1 )
- June 2010 ( 1 )
- January 2010 ( 1 )
- April 2008 ( 1 )
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
Fraudulent Review & Approval
City Planner misrepresents site in connection with Planning Commission chairman's Special Use Permit application. Planning Commission approves permit despite deficient application, non-conforming site plan, and building located outside property boundary.